Friday, February 27, 2009

What is Wrong with Most Science Fiction Films?


“Science really doesn't exist. Scientific beliefs are either proved wrong, or else they quickly become engineering. Everything else is untested speculation.”
James P. Hogan

It really, really drove this squirrel nuts.

Our intrepid heroes are “on the other side of the galaxy” while listening to a battle on their handy-dandy “faster-than-light” radio. The Forces of Good are losing. Suddenly, unable to stand it anymore, the captain, in violation of the orders he has been given, takes his ship, at top speed, to Earth, where they arrive just in time to avert disaster.

So, what bugged me? Instantaneous interstellar communications? Well, maybe a little; but that’s not it. Faster-than-light travel? Nope, hard to have interstellar travel without some form of FTL (Faster-than-light) flight. What bugged me was the fact that they arrived back at Earth before the battle was over!

You see, their ship, while capable of speeds much faster than those allowed by Einstein’s theories, still had to travel at a finite speed. The battle would have been long over before they could have possibly arrived at the battlefield.

Think it through with me – The fastest boat in the world has a top speed of just over 300 miles-per-hour. Let’s say that you have that boat and are floating just off of the mouth of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, listening on your radio to a battle that is taking place in Tokyo Bay. It is 4784 miles from Seattle to Tokyo in a straight line, and that’s close enough for our purposes. In the fastest boat in the world, it will take you 16 hours to get to Tokyo, far too late to help (not that that sort of speed boat would have the range to make such a journey.)

I hear the question, “Ah, Squirrel, your thinking about this all wrong! Don’t think “boats,” think “airplanes!” Ok, I’ll play…

The fastest plane in the world is Lockheed’s SR-71, and it can fly at 2,200 mph. Not counting take-off, landing, and aerial refueling times, you could go from Seattle to Tokyo in 2 ¼ hours. Fast, but not fast enough. Again, the battle would be over before you could get there.

Nobody really expects absolute realism out of Hollywood. When it only takes Jack Bauer 12 minutes to get from Fontana to Glendale, we chuckle knowingly and enjoy the show. But we wouldn’t be so willing to suspend our disbelief if he took 20 minutes to drive from Barstow to Fresno! (I’ve been waiting for the season where Jack spends 2 whole hours stuck on the 405, trying to keep up with the action on his cell phone.)

“But, wait, Squirrel! 24 takes place in the ‘real world,’ you’re talking about Sci-Fi! It’s not supposed to be real!”

I beg your pardon! We’re talking about Science fiction. It’s supposed to be scientific! You know, science. [sci·ence (noun) – the study of the physical and natural world and phenomena, especially by using systematic observation and experiment - Encarta Dictionary On-line 2009] Science fiction is supposed to be scientifically plausible. Unfortunately, the film and television industries think all you need is a few ray-guns, robots, and rocket ships to make a good science fiction film. “Who needs good writing? Heck, a pretty girl, some wiz-bang special effects, a robot or two, and we’re on our way!”

Now, I know that some things are simply the dictates of the practicality of film making. Star Trek originally came up with the transporter device because it would have been cost-prohibitive to manufacture the special effects needed to show them landing and taking off every time they visited a planet. The vast majority of space ships in film and television also have artificial gravity, because it would be cost-prohibitive to film in the zero gravity of space. (And wire work just looks really cheesy – can anybody say Moonraker?) But none of that excuses sheer nonsense in writing.

(Science fiction books, in general, don’t seem to have this problem. Most (but, unfortunately, not all) people who write books expect that their audience is, at least, literate. But really good books can be turned into really bad movies – can anyone say Starship Troopers?)

This is more than just a pet peeve with me. I see it as a symptom of a much larger problem: the lack of critical thinking skills among people. I’ve seen this trend referred to as “the dumbing-down of America.” What’s “real” doesn’t matter anymore. In a word, it’s postmodernism, and it doesn’t affect science alone, but also history, economics, politics – indeed, every endeavor of mankind.

Since Biblical Christianity is a reasonable faith, people's lack of reasoning skills are a problem.

Please don’t get me wrong: I’m not defending modernism as a worldview. There is more truth than can be ascertained by scientific reason alone. And I’m not at all prepared to get into the religion of naturalistic materialism, which masquerades as science; at least, not today. But, dagnabit, films about science should be scientific!

I like science fiction. I like it a lot. I've been a space nut since I was a kid, and science fiction is probably at the top of the list for recreational reading material. There are good books and good films out there. And I'm willing to ignore pervasive materialism, blatant atheism, and ever-present evolutionary bias in an effort to enjoy a good story. But I've got a problem with pure irrationality.

So, Hollywood! If you want to make science fiction movies, can we go for a little more realism? Please?

13 comments:

Shinar Squirrel said...

Want to try something fun? Go to Google maps and ask for directions from Seattle to Tokyo. Too fun!

The Squirrel

Joshua Cookingham said...

Lol, this kinda reminds me of my friend who gets upset every time he sees someone shooting bullets through the water in an action flick, or my other friend whose main criticism of Superman Returns was: "His cape would NOT be floating in space!"

Seriously though, it would be good if people would actually STUDY for the genres they're writing. It's interesting that we have a many more means of research at our disposal than did Rodenberry, and yet we are even more off the mark in our accuracy.

Do you think maybe it's because people are tired of reality, or are they just lazy?

Anyway, cool post, God bless!

Shinar Squirrel said...

Joshua,

I think that it is a combination of both laziness and disinterest in the genre. Most of the really good science fiction (book type) writers seem to be either scientists or engineers. Scratch that, most of the really good science fiction writers are engineers (or have an engineering background) who are used to dealing with practical solutions to real situations. The culture of Hollywood is not exactly defined by “practicality.”

Of course, it helps to have good stories :- There’s a lot of bad writing in all genres! As I wrote in the post, even really good stories can be poorly adapted to film. Blade Runner, Total Recall, and Minority Report were all adapted from short stories by Phillip K. Dick, and look at how differently they were treated by different screen writers and directors.

-The Squirrel

Joshua Cookingham said...

Hmmm....
I hated Blade Runner, never saw Total Recall, and enjoyed Minority Report....go figure.

Lol.

Fusion! said...

I loved Minority Report. What did you think of Sunshine? I thought it was a vastly underrated sci-fi flick. As a Star Trek :TNG fan, it has bugged many of us in seeing that they don't age the way they should if they really traveled at those FTL speeds. Contact kind of dealt with it though.

Shinar Squirrel said...

Fusion,

Sorry, I havn't seen Sunshine. It's now on my "to be rented soon" list. Thanks :)

The Squirrel

pilgrim mommy said...

Where did you get the pic of the light sabre wielding squirrels? It's great!

Personally, I favor Doctor Who but I think that is an acquired taste.

(BTW, I followed the links to your site from TeamPyro because of your unusual display name.)

Shinar Squirrel said...

No secret on the Jedi Squirrels. I did a Google image search on "squirrel" and found it.

Glad you found me (c:

The Squirrel

Shinar Squirrel said...

And I like Dr. Who, also.

The Squirrel

Aaron said...

I think you'd have to be more specific to criticize the time. Some SciFi sequences show multiple things going on a different times. I know that in STTNG, they often gave estimated arrival times.

Be it as it may sometimes "facts" don't make for good movies or TV. These movies and tv shows all have experts in various fields who consult. Being in law enforcment, I know this is true with law enforcement shows. But for a lot of reasons, the producers decide to do something totally unrealistic.

I too think the CA sequences are funny. I spent 8 years as a federal agent in Los Angeles. Let me tell you, for a warrant to be executed at 7AM, you had to leave your house at 4:30 AM just to make sure you got there in time.

Shinar Squirrel said...

Aaron,

The movie was Star Trek: First Contact, and it really was exactly as I described. They were “on the far side of the Federation,” listening to the battle on the sub-space radio, when Picard decided to violate his orders and return to Earth. Even at warp 9 or 10, there’s no way they would have made it in time. I enjoyed the movie, otherwise.

It's kinda like the never ending clip of amunition in the Uzi, or Roy Rogers' 6-shooter that fires 27 times without reloading.

Apollo 13, while, yes, a true story, shows what real science fiction could be: A technically accurate world as the backdrop to a well written story.

The Squirrel

Aaron said...

Squirrel did you do the math on how long it would have taken? I actually don't put that much thought into the movies since at some point, the FI (fiction) will overpower the SCI part. I'm sure if you looked some trekkies could tell you how the radio actually works.

Have you ever been the the Las Vegas Hilton? Great fun if your a trekkie of any flavor.

Shinar Squirrel said...

Lol - No, I didn't do the math; I'm not that bad, I hope. But, on the TV show, they were always weeks away from Earth. Starfleet Command had sent the Enterprise far away so that they would not be able to interfere, so...

Actually, I’m a long time fan of the genre. I went to my first Science Fiction convention over 20 years ago, and one of the favorite pastimes at such conventions is picking apart the details and laughing at the unscientific Hollywood-isms.

I've never made it to the LV Hilton's exhibits, but I've heard good things.

The Squirrel